<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jury Nullification: The Only Moral Option</title>
	<link>http://nothirdsolution.com/2008/03/21/jury-nullification-the-only-moral-option/</link>
	<description>Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: A Stitch in Haste</title>
		<link>http://nothirdsolution.com/2008/03/21/jury-nullification-the-only-moral-option/#comment-3704</link>
		<author>A Stitch in Haste</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nothirdsolution.com/2008/03/21/jury-nullification-the-only-moral-option/#comment-3704</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Nullification Denouement...&lt;/strong&gt;

WindyPundit weighs in:Unless you are truly devoid of moral reasoning, there must be some level of unjustness at which you will abandon the law to ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Nullification Denouement&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>WindyPundit weighs in:Unless you are truly devoid of moral reasoning, there must be some level of unjustness at which you will abandon the law to &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8230;no third solution &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comments on Comments #11</title>
		<link>http://nothirdsolution.com/2008/03/21/jury-nullification-the-only-moral-option/#comment-3706</link>
		<author>&#8230;no third solution &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comments on Comments #11</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nothirdsolution.com/2008/03/21/jury-nullification-the-only-moral-option/#comment-3706</guid>
					<description>[...] Esquire responds in brief to my second post on jury nullification, which was a response to his podcast on the same subject:  1. That libertarians do not have a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Esquire responds in brief to my second post on jury nullification, which was a response to his podcast on the same subject:  1. That libertarians do not have a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8230;no third solution &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jury Nullification and Blocked Defenses</title>
		<link>http://nothirdsolution.com/2008/03/21/jury-nullification-the-only-moral-option/#comment-3847</link>
		<author>&#8230;no third solution &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jury Nullification and Blocked Defenses</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nothirdsolution.com/2008/03/21/jury-nullification-the-only-moral-option/#comment-3847</guid>
					<description>[...] the advocates of nullification (myself, included) suggest is that it be used to prevent injustices from occurring at the hands of the State. There [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the advocates of nullification (myself, included) suggest is that it be used to prevent injustices from occurring at the hands of the State. There [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
