The Peak Oil Myth
March 25, 2008
Some people find my blog by searching for “peak oil myth.”
Although I’ve previously said things like, “Oil isn’t running out, yet. And it never will,” I’d like to clarify here: peak oil is definitely not a myth. There will come a time when the production of oil will diminish at accelerating rates, and the price of oil will rise proportionally.
What I mean when I talk about the “peak oil myth” is the conclusions so often drawn from the concept of peak-anything. The presumption, mistaken of course, is that as oil becomes more expensive, mankind will be impoverished and perhaps cease to exist in a bloody armageddon over the last drops! This can’t be so, can it?
Of course not! As oil becomes more expensive, the opportunity costs of other fuels becomes comparatively less expensive. These are some of the same sources of energy which my callous inner-economist decries as socialist drivel, like solar power or hydrogen. These are only bad ides insofar as they’re economically unviable at the present, and therefore any State subsidization of these sources constitutes outright waste.
As other sources of energy become more viable, economically, investment in these resources will be stimulated. Competition among market participants will lead to technological innovations, and the accompanying savings brought about by competitive price reductions. Ultimately in real terms, the prices of these alternative energy sources will probably be lower than the current price of oil, because some alternative sources are economically abundant.
Because of this, there is no justifiable reason to make people pay more now (through tax-subsidies) for something that will ultimately be less costly in the future!
Comments
4 Comments so far
Leave a Comment
If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
Categories
- Agora!
- American Politics
- Anarchy!
- Blog Reactions
- Bureaucracy
- Conspiracy Theory
- Democracy is Great!
- Dog Blogging
- Drug War Rants
- Economic Fallacies
- Economics Lessons
- Election '08
- environmentalism
- Food & Drink
- Fun Stuff
- Gay Rights
- gnar
- gold bugging
- Government is Slavery
- Gun Control
- Health Care
- immigration
- junk science
- Left Libertarian
- Legalese
- Literature
- localized
- MA Carnival
- memes
- metablogging
- order from chaos
- personal finance
- Personal Life
- Police State
- ponderings
- Pop Culture
- Potpourri
- Property Rights
- quotes
- Rants
- Religion
- Rent Seeking
- Seen and Unseen
- shredding gnar
- Strikebusting
- Subsidize This!
- Taxation is Theft
- Uncategorized
- Warfare State
- Women's Studies 101
- World Politics
- world travel
Wow, I am so glad you posted on this, because this is one of the most common “leftie” Anarchist myths.
What alternative sources are you imagining?? There is nothing known that comes close to the energy profit ratio of light, sweet crude oil.
Good day,
The hope and/or assertion that the free market will allow another energy source to usurp oil is inherently flawed. The most difficult reality to comprehend and accept is that no combination of alternative energies can come even close to providing the energy density of oil, nor can any of them be used as the feed-stocks for our plastics, medicines, and over 500,000 other products and chemicals. Without oil, we cease to live the lives of comfort and convenience we have become accustomed to. Solar electricity can’t produce tires, clothing, or fertilizers. Hydrogen is not an energy source, only a inefficient storage device. And any alternative energy source is wholly dependent upon fossil fuels for it’s extraction, transport, and distribution, and ongoing maintenance.
To better understand this critical limitation, review the concept of the Cubic Mile here: http://spectrum.ieee.org/jan07/4820/ncmo01 and here: http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2186 This work was done by the respected IEEE, the world’s largest professional technology association.
The laws of thermodynamics ultimately constrain and limit us, and no combination of human inventiveness or money can make energy, only manage it.
Thanks for the forum.
Dave
Bla bla bla, who gives a fuck? Oil might be more efficient, but that doesn’t mean people will keep using it even if the price skyrockets.
Y’all are fucked.