<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jury Nullification and Blocked Defenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nothirdsolution.com/2008/04/22/jury-nullification-and-blocked-defenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nothirdsolution.com/2008/04/22/jury-nullification-and-blocked-defenses/</link>
	<description>Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Stitch in Haste</title>
		<link>http://www.nothirdsolution.com/2008/04/22/jury-nullification-and-blocked-defenses/#comment-3850</link>
		<dc:creator>A Stitch in Haste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nothirdsolution.com/2008/04/22/jury-nullification-and-blocked-defenses/#comment-3850</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Should Jury Nullification Apply to Blocked Defenses Too?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Question for the nullifiers: At least one state forbids the use of the so-called "gay panic defense." Should a nullifier be entitled to disregard that prohibition and vote to acquit a gay-basher in defiance of both the law and the jury instructions?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Should Jury Nullification Apply to Blocked Defenses Too?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Question for the nullifiers: At least one state forbids the use of the so-called &#8220;gay panic defense.&#8221; Should a nullifier be entitled to disregard that prohibition and vote to acquit a gay-basher in defiance of both the law and the jury instructions?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
