Fire Protection as a Public Good
April 25, 2007
The more you look into “public goods,” the more historical evidence you find that suggests that they weren’t always as “public” as we’ve been led to believe, viz., we are taught that certain goods or services cannot be produced on the market, therefore the government must provide them, and therefore taxation is justified in securing the necessary funds to operate the programs that provide them. I previously examined the Lighthouse Problem, after coming across an interview on the subject with Ronald Coase, at Reason a while back. Tonight, I learned about another example
In 1666, the City of London burned to the ground. Shortly thereafter, an Englishman by the name of Nicholas Unless-Jesus-Christ-Had-Died-For-Thee-Thou-Hadst-Been-Damned Barbon (seriously) is generally credited with creating the first sort of fire insurance:
Afterwards, insurance companies formed private fire brigades to protect their clients’ property. Insurance brigades would only fight fires at buildings the company insured. These buildings were identified by a badge or sign.
Today, most properties are insured against fire, either by covenant or regulation, so the free-rider problem is pretty much non-existent.
So, why do we pay taxes for this sort of thing today?
++++++++++
UPDATE: Russ Roberts, from CafeHayek e-mailed me today to point me to one possible answer: Rent Seeking. You can read Fred S. McChesney’s “Smoke and Errors” over at Econlib.
Thanks, Russ!
Comments
2 Comments so far
Leave a Comment
If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.
Archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
Categories
- Agora!
- American Politics
- Anarchy!
- Blog Reactions
- Bureaucracy
- Conspiracy Theory
- Democracy is Great!
- Dog Blogging
- Drug War Rants
- Economic Fallacies
- Economics Lessons
- Election ‘08
- environmentalism
- Food & Drink
- Fun Stuff
- Gay Rights
- gnar
- gold bugging
- Government is Slavery
- Gun Control
- Health Care
- immigration
- junk science
- Legalese
- Literature
- localized
- MA Carnival
- memes
- metablogging
- order from chaos
- personal finance
- Personal Life
- Police State
- ponderings
- Pop Culture
- Potpourri
- Property Rights
- quotes
- Rants
- Religion
- Rent Seeking
- Seen and Unseen
- shredding gnar
- Strikebusting
- Subsidize This!
- Taxation is Theft
- Uncategorized
- Warfare State
- Women’s Studies 101
- World Politics
- world travel
[…] Shaw Lumber Co., a private lumber company in the Moosehead Lake region of Maine, in 1906. This is not the first time that the quasi-public good of fire protection was provided by purely private means. But it is yet […]
[…] Some people used to say that lighthouses were just such a pressing need. Some people argue that fire protection is a pressing need. Those people were wrong. And there is no “pressing need” to eat […]