no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics

20,000%

July 18th, 2007

Here’s a lesson from my forthcoming “Public Choice for Idiots.”

As a politician, you want to give people things for free. This can be education, health-care, laptop computers or iPods or cheese. It doesn’t matter. Now, in order to give people things for “free,” you need to get the money from someone else. Here’s one popular method:

  1. Choose a product with limited appeal. Bonus points if it’s a “luxury” good.
  2. Tax the motherfucking bejeezus out of it.  Bonus points if it’s “for the children.”
  3. ???

Unfortunately, the law of unintended consequences usually takes over at this point. A ten percent ad valorem on yachts literally decimated the domestic yacht-building industry, as Different River explains citing this paper by FEE:

Ocean Yachts in Weekstown[, NJ] trimmed its workforce from 350 to 50. Egg Harbor Yachts entered Chapter Eleven bankruptcy, going from 200 employees to five. Viking Yachts dropped from 1,400 to 300 employees. According to a Congressional Joint Economic Committee Study, the boat industry nationwide lost 7,600 employees within one year.

Apparently, Congressional Democrats figured that anyone who could afford to buy a luxury yacht could afford to pay an extra 10% tax. It turned out that anyone who could afford to buy a luxury yacht could also afford not to buy a luxury yacht. If you have lots of money, there’s always something else you can spend it on.

Never ones to learn from their historical mistakes (of which there are plenty), some ass-hats are proposing a twenty-thousand-percent tax increase on cigars. Twenty-thousand – as in four zeroes. 20,000%. The tax would rise from five cents to ten dollars. This of course, is terrible news for the domestic cigar producers and importers – 80% of which are located in Florida, and also for anyone who enjoys a decent stick from time to time:

Though the [Tampa, FL cigar industry] has shriveled from foreign competition and domestic consolidation, cigarmaking still employs more than 1,000 in Tampa. About 900 work at the factory, offices and warehouse of Hav-a-Tampa, owned by foreign tobacco giant Altadis…

…”Why don’t we just go out of business?” Newman said. “Here, you can run our company, Mr. Government.”

That’s what the Cuban families did. And Cuban cigars are little more than novelty items these days. Of course, some people are willing to pay $7 for a Romeo y Julieta, and there are people who are willing to pay $17 for a Davidoff or whatever costs $17, but by-and-large, they are different people. The person shelling out $17 isn’t going to spend $17 on a RyJ, and the people who weren’t spending $17 on arguably finer cigars before, are unlikely to spend that much money just to enjoy the same old $7 cigar.

Of course, the tax will probably pass – because practically nobody smokes cigars, and the industry doesn’t have a voice when it’s lumped in with Big Tobacco. This follows the above rules. The results of the tax will predictably be disastrous, as theory dictates: the industry will suffer severely, and revenue won’t be nearly as much as the tax’s proponents suggest. Over time, the revenue will fall as people find an alternative to the super-expensive cigars. And then the “children,” the alleged beneficiaries of this tax, will be without their health-care, again.

Airline Deregulation

July 17th, 2007

Say what you will, the airline industry in the United States is nowhere close to being a free, competitive market. After a protracted struggle with the FAA, Virgin Atlantic was recently cleared to begin flying intra-U.S. routes, beginning late this year.

It shouldn’t have taken this long.

Also, from my NWA WorldPerks e-mail this morning:

The Department of Transportation (DOT) plans to award a limited number of new routes to China between 2007 and 2009. Northwest Airlines is asking the DOT for authority to fly Detroit-Shanghai nonstop service beginning in 2007 and Detroit-Beijing nonstop service beginning in 2009. If selected to operate the new routes, more than 100 U.S. cities will enjoy convenient, single connection service to China through Northwest’s WorldGateway hub at Detroit Metropolitan Airport, the premier international connecting airport in the U.S.

The body of the message begs for me to sign a petition, in hopes that with enough signatures, NWA might be granted some of these lucrative flights. Now, if China wants to limit the number of inbound flights from Detroit – or any other U.S. city – there’s not much we can do about it. Would it be stupid? Probably. But this is what I’d expect from the People’s Republic.

Clearly, the domestic carriers see either unmet demand or potential demand for trans-Pacific flights to China – else they wouldn’t be begging their customers for support in their attempts to gain political favors. The DOT is not a group of entrepreneurs and there isn’t much reason to think that they have the slightest amount of business acumen. Let the airlines fly the routes they see fit, bound of course by the destination airport’s capacity to accept inbound flights, which of course requires the airlines and their customers to weigh the opportunity costs involved. This doesn’t need to be a bureaucratic decision.

Legalize it *more*!

July 5th, 2007

Washington State legislators are getting ready to set statutory limits on the amount of marijuana that constitutes the legally permissible “60-day supply” for terminally ill people in that State. The users of course fear that any limits will be set too low for those individuals in the most pain; and the legislators recognize that there really isn’t any line which can be drawn with any significance, e.g., is one-half pound enough? Nine ounces? 9.5 ounces?

But until the States are willing to come to the defense of their citizens contra an over-reaching Federal government, it’s all a dog-and-pony show:

As is the case anywhere in the country, nothing in state statute shields a patient from prosecution under federal law, which does not recognize medical uses for marijuana.

This has happened repeatedly in California, since the People’s Republic legalized medicinal herb. SWAT teams and other paramilitary task-forces have repeatedly raided co-operatives owned and operated by AIDS patients and octogenarians with terminal cancer, all proper under Federal law. I haven’t heard of this happening in Washington, yet – although it probably has, and it certainly will in the future. If you’re going to pass a law, and seriously entertain a law which is in direct opposition to Federal law or executive order, or whatever Orwellian nonsense justifies Federal interference, then have the basic human decency to defend your constituents.

Failure to do so is prima facie evidence that all your talk is mere posturing, and that your oath of office is in fact, idle wind. You are responsible to nobody, and your actions (or inactions) demonstrate as much.

no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics