no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics

Ihren Papieren, Bitte!

January 11th, 2008

I came across a couple interesting quotes in recent articles about the REAL ID Act, so let me jump on the bandwagon make some predictions. The REAL ID Act is bound to make the line at your friendly, neighborhood Department of Motor Vehicles (or Secretary of State) even longer. This is due to the fact that applicants will have to be checked and cross-checked and re-checked through various federal databases. Until the transition is complete, expect longer lines at airports where overworked NSA staffers with contribute to the problem of making everyone else’s life hell by monitoring the holes in our socks and confiscating our bottled water, while simultaneously neglecting to notice the lighter or knife that I’ve inadvertently taken on more than one cross-country flight. The inconvenience is only the beginning — the REAL ID really may be the thin end of the wedge, opening the door for even further government control and scrutiny.

Without a REAL ID, airline passengers will have to use a passport or other federal ID, otherwise they’ll face a “vigorous, secondary screening process.” Secretary of the DHS, Michael Chertoff is either delusional, or drunk with power:

The last thing I want to do is punish citizens of a state who would love to have a REAL ID license but can’t get one. But in the end, the rule is the rule as passed by Congress.

Sure! Everyone would “love” to have a shiny new Federal ID card. That is awfully presumptuous. Apparently Chertoff has no qualms about punishing people who don’t want one.

Unfortunately, many of the States which have opposed the REAL ID Act have argued that it’s simply to expensive.

“No problem!” said the Feds, who proceeded to reduce the expected compliance costs by 73% — as if $4 Billion isn’t still an awful lot of money.

“It costs too much” isn’t a very strong objection, which tells me that there’s not very much disagreement between the State and Federal lawmakers, despite rhetoric to the contrary.

Impeach Bush

January 6th, 2008

In the Washington Post, George McGovern opines:

Bush and Cheney are clearly guilty of numerous impeachable offenses. They have repeatedly violated the Constitution. They have transgressed national and international law. They have lied to the American people time after time. Their conduct and their barbaric policies have reduced our beloved country to a historic low in the eyes of people around the world. These are truly “high crimes and misdemeanors”…

The basic strategy of the administration has been to encourage a climate of fear, letting it exploit the 2001 al-Qaeda attacks not only to justify the invasion of Iraq but also to excuse such dangerous misbehavior as the illegal tapping of our telephones by government agents.

I sympathize with McGovern to an extent, but believe that his appeal to the Constitution is misguided, at best.

At the end of the day, the men who comprise the government are the ultimate arbiters of whether that document can or cannot control their actions. Over two hundred years of history suggest that it has never really been able to do the one thing it was designed to do: limit the government, and protect the people. This is probably because it is an inanimate piece of parchment that A) cannot enforce itself (by virtue of being an inanimate piece of parchment) and B) is unlikely to be enforced by the people comprising government (by virtue of the benefits they stand to gain by violating it).

Lysander Spooner once said that, “[T]he Constitution has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.” Almost a hundred and forty years later, Spooner’s proclamation is no less true.

Quick Hits

December 28th, 2007

If gold is such an anachronism, why do governments maintain such large stockpiles of it?

++

Who knew that the Unions are in favor of national healthcare?

Union members and outside experts said the UAW will have difficulty keeping its commitments unless the federal government has a national health care system within 5-15 years.

Always looking out for their members, everyone else be damned.

++

Egypt is trying to copyright pyramids “in an attempt to get paid from the sale of replicas…” Even if you are inclined to accept traditional arguments in favor of Intellectual Property (i.e., the inventor/creator’s right to profit from his time and effort), this is utterly absurd. Egypt, a sovereign country, is trying to claim a copyright on something that they basically found, which merely by accident happens to lie within their present-day borders. Could Norway claim copyright on fjords? Can Spain copyright “The Americas”? Can China copyright pork-fried rice, and earn royalties on every late-night quart served anywhere in the world?

++

New home sales are at a 12-year low. This is not particularly good news, especially when it is combined with the number of adjustable rate mortgage loans (this is not limited to subprime loans) which have yet to reset, and are scheduled to do so throughout 2008.

subprime

Not good at all. Looks like 2008 is going to be one hell of a year…

no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics