no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics

Quick Hits

December 28th, 2007

If gold is such an anachronism, why do governments maintain such large stockpiles of it?

++

Who knew that the Unions are in favor of national healthcare?

Union members and outside experts said the UAW will have difficulty keeping its commitments unless the federal government has a national health care system within 5-15 years.

Always looking out for their members, everyone else be damned.

++

Egypt is trying to copyright pyramids “in an attempt to get paid from the sale of replicas…” Even if you are inclined to accept traditional arguments in favor of Intellectual Property (i.e., the inventor/creator’s right to profit from his time and effort), this is utterly absurd. Egypt, a sovereign country, is trying to claim a copyright on something that they basically found, which merely by accident happens to lie within their present-day borders. Could Norway claim copyright on fjords? Can Spain copyright “The Americas”? Can China copyright pork-fried rice, and earn royalties on every late-night quart served anywhere in the world?

++

New home sales are at a 12-year low. This is not particularly good news, especially when it is combined with the number of adjustable rate mortgage loans (this is not limited to subprime loans) which have yet to reset, and are scheduled to do so throughout 2008.

subprime

Not good at all. Looks like 2008 is going to be one hell of a year…

Critical Illness Insurance and Socialized Health Care

October 30th, 2007

In July 2007 issue of Best’s Review, if you have a subscription, you’ll find an article called “Critical Care,” which discusses the current and potential future market for critical illness insurance, either as a supplemental rider to an existing health insurance policy or as a stand-alone. One comment that struck me as odd appears on page 88:

The United States is caught in a catch-up game when it comes to critical illness sales.

Great Britain, Australia, Ireland, Japan and Canada have had much success in the market, “Those socialized medicine countries have been successfully selling it as a ‘don’t die on a waiting list’ type of insurance.”

My question is this: Are we really “lagging behind” if there’s simply no market for a “don’t die on a waiting list” policy in America? Do we want to foster that sort of environment?

To be sure, there are a number of reasons why CII hasn’t caught on here, including the regulatory environment, but don’t you think that at least part of the reason is because there simply isn’t a very great danger of dying on the waiting list, in a country where there’s practically never (unless you need a kidney or something) a waiting list?

So, socialized insurance requires supplemental insurance so that you don’t die because you have the socialized insurance. Sicko, indeed.

no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics