no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics

What Does a Libertarian Economy Look Like?

July 24th, 2010

Quoth the Faux Capitalist, on libertarianism and “Austrian” economists:

For me, a libertarian is someone who believes that limited government is the most likely to protect the liberties of the people whom it governs, and that shouldn’t necessitate an economic system based on a scarce resource such as gold.

Any economy (I do not prefer the term “economic system”) is not “based” on currency. It’s based on the exchange (often consisting in currency) of scarce resources. Some resources happen to be more scarce than others. Historically it is those resources, in particular the precious metals, that have been chosen as monetary commodities. This is so for a number of reasons I need not explain at present.

So it’s a gross misunderstanding, I think, to characterize the Austrians as gold-fetishists (although there are certainly some worthy of that). In fact, it’s not advocacy of an “economic system”, but rather a belief that in the absence of any coerced “system”, a free market settles upon a common medium (or perhaps, media) of exchange.

Anyone who advocates an “economic system” based on anything other than freedom and exchange is not a libertarian.

“Things Could Be Worse”

October 12th, 2009

Stephan responds briefly to a common objection to anarchism:

I get people who tell me “Yes, the government is bad, but look at it this way, things could be worse”. It’s true that I could be living in some other country under conditions that are even worse, but that’s not the point.

Practically none of us desire to see a world that’s a worse place to live in, in fact many of us routinely dig deep, even during tough times, to help out those less fortunate, so why presume that we’d let it become something worse?

This is an objection raised on propaganda: People imagine “things could be worse” because they imagine a world without any of the “good” things which governments provide*. The government builds roads, maintains the police, provides for law and order, ensures the quality of our foods, etc., so without government there would be neither roads, nor police, nor law nor order and we’d all eat naught but poison until we die.

It’s clearly stupid to believe this, but many people do because they’ve been conditioned to believe it, and they’ve never been taught to think for themselves (a reflection on the sorry state of public education, I might add).

They are afraid that things would be worse, without a government to control and influence nearly every aspect of their personal lives**. But this is a very untenable assumption unless one unconditionally supports everything the government has ever done and will ever do. And for the record, “everything” includes “Don’t ask, don’t tell”, housing projects, rent control, restrictions on your rights to peacefully assemble, to bear arms, to speak freely, to love who you want to love, to drive an SUV, whether and what to smoke, to eat organic foods, etc. “Everything” also includes internment camps, apartheid, chattel slavery, civilian massacres, corporate welfare, Agent Orange, trashing the environment, destroying our cities, etc.

People are so preoccupied with the how-bad-things-might-become in the worst-case scenario, that they’ve entirely neglected how bad things actually are.

If you say, “Things could be worse,” I challenge you to instead imagine how things could be better.

+++

* In the real world, all of the “good things” come at a the expense of something worse: Either these “good things” rely on violence (in order to pay Peter, the government must first rob from Paul) or, due to the law of unintended consequences, inadvertently cause something else undesirable.

** Every intereference in the market, whether tax, subsidy, regulation, or prohibition, ultimately has an effect on the other tradeoffs and decisions we make.

When Is a Recovery Not a Recovery?

October 3rd, 2009

When it’s a jobless recovery, i.e., that fiction by which the Politicians and Fat-Cats pretend that everything is A-OK, in order to trick the rest of us into following their marching orders off the next goddamn cliff, next year or next decade.

But it’s worse than “jobless”, which suggests job neutrality.  In reality, jobs are disappearing.

Last November it was big news when the FT reported[1] that the world’s economies lost 80,000 jobs. Now, we learn that the American economy shed 263,000 jobs in the month of September[2] alone, sending the national unemployment rate close to 10%. Adding insult to injury, people are remaining unemployed longer than ever: more than 50% of them have recently exhausted their public benefits. What happens to these people?

Even though young college graduates with a few years of work experience have suffered the least (so far), they’ve still been relatively hammered over the past year. Ihe unemployment rate among college graduates 25 years old has nearly doubled since 2008, approaching 5% for 2009[3].

Unemployment rates are increasing

If the aggregate unemployment rate for people 25-34 is 10.1%, and college grads are pacing 4.5%, what’s happening to those without a degree?  Do the math: they’re faring far worse.  These people are supposed to be just starting out, but how will they ever get out of their own way when they start with such a severe handicap? They’ll be 26, 27, 28 years old with no relevant work experience. If and when the economy recovers, there will be a new class of college graduates, competing with the classes of 2006 through 2009, who have been diligently pumping gas and waiting tables at TGIFriday’s for the last five years, patiently waiting for an opportunity to toil for the same people now responsible for their collective misfortune.

Fifteen million people want to work (more precisely, they want to earn), but can’t find employment. I’ve previously written that whenever resources are idle and needs are unsatisfied, there is something fundamentally wrong. But it goes beyond fundamentals when this amount of dis-coordination persists for any measurable amount of time. It is evidence that errors have not been corrected, malinvestments have not been liquidated, resources and labor have not been reallocated towards valuable output, etc.  This amount of disequilibrium can only be effected force, suppression, and exploitation.  People aren’t working because they’re not allowed to work.

Economic crises are part of State capitalism.  Crises, their concomitant mass-unemployments, discoordination and idleness of capital resources, are the means by which the power structure is sustained by the few, subjugating the many to lingering fears of total collapse and destitution.  Without widespread economic crises, the hierarchy flattens and power disperses.  Individuals retain their wealth, they retain control of their lives and livelihood.

Now, individuals need to take the power back.  We’ve been waiting for orders our entire lives, and where has it gotten us?

Don’t ask for permission, don’t wait for orders. Take life into your own hands.  As long as there are needs yet unment (and there are), there are jobs that need to be done.  People need to do these jobs.   We can wait for the jobs to come back, or we can create them ourselves.  Withdraw, as much as possible, from the slave economy.  Pay fewer taxes (or none at all).  Ignore stupid regulations. Take care of your neighbor and your neighbors take care of you.  Grow community.

The only sustainable recovery occurs when people no longer fear “the economy”, when people realize that they, in their individual capacities are “the economy”.

+++

  1. More than 80,000 jobs cut in just five days. (Permalink from FT.com, may no longer be active)

  2. Jobless Report Is Worse Than Expected; Rate Rises to 9.8%

  3. BLS data: Series LNS14027662 – Seasonal unemployment, 25yrs+, BS or higher education, Series LNS14000000 – Seasonal unemployment (Total) [link] and BLS Table A-13 Employment status of the civilian non-institutional population by age, sex, and race.

no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics