no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics

A Central Banker Says “No.”

August 14th, 2007

As the Fed continues to inflate inject liquidity into the market, I’d watch for the dollar to fall even further against Sterling. Despite the ongoing “credit crunch,” formerly known euphemistically as an “economic downturn,” formerly known as a “recession,” sometimes “depression,” and in its most pronounced manifestation, “Flucht in die Sachwerte” – the U.S. central bank seems content to repeat the errors of the past, the Bank of England, on the other hand, remains reluctant to offer any bailouts to the market:

“Interest rates aren’t a policy instrument to protect unwise lenders from the consequences of their unwise decisions,” [Bank of England Governor Mervyn] King said at the release of the bank’s quarterly inflation report last week, before the credit crisis erupted.

Indeed, interest rates aren’t a game or a policy instrument. Start falsifying economic calculation, and it’s only a matter of time before its effects catch up with you. By far, one of the wiser statements issued by a Central Banker that I’ve ever come across.

The Essence of Socialism

August 13th, 2007

Note: This post originally appeared on the anniversary of the completion of the Berlin Wall. In memory of the first refugee slain attempting to cross over it, one 18-year old German laborer named Peter Fechter, this post will remain at the top of the blog through the anniversary of his death on August 17. Mr. Fechter would be 63 if he hadn’t been gunned down 45 years ago, Friday.

13.8.2007

Remember that every wall capable of keeping your enemies out, is just as capable of imprisoning you.

I came across this in yesterday’s NYT which requires a pesky, yet free “registration.” A similar story appears in The Independent:

East German rulers always insisted the use of firearms at the border was a “last resort”. The document [recently discovered by German archivists] proves otherwise.

August 17, 1962Setting aside pedantic inquiries such as, for what exactly, are these tactics a “last resort?” this revelation should come as no surprise. Surprising, perhaps, that someone found the order, but did you – even for a moment – doubt that such an order existed? If you’re not allowed to leave, it’s not a society, it’s a gulag. It’s not voluntary and compassionate, it’s a death march. And socialism proper requires the use of these tactics; it is undeniable slavery on an epic scale. Lethal force is simply the “last resort” used against anyone who wants to leave.

Even when the gun is out in the open, for all to see – even when we see the slaughter of innocents – someone in an official-looking uniform tells us, straight-faced, that there is in fact no gun.

But if there were, of course, it would only be for our protection.

++

More thoughts from Astute Bloggers.

Social Cost and Rogue States

July 12th, 2007

Let’s say I want to put a work-shed in my backyard, with a wood-burning stove so that I can use it during the winter months. I plan on burning refuse – mostly wood pallettes discarded by the stamping plant down the street. As my neighbor, this upsets you because you’ll have to look at the smoke billowing from my stove-pipe all winter long, and occasionally the smoke drifts low into your yard.

When you ask me to stop, I politely remind you that it’s not dissimilar to your smoker during hunting season, or to the incessant noise of your children playing basketball at 10pm on a weeknight. As there is no statute that forbids me from using a wood-burner in the winter, it seems we’re at an impasse. Until you offer to purchase and install a natural-gas heater in my shop, and thereafter, I stop burning old, oily wood.

Or maybe you don’t want me using or building nuclear reactors, so you give me a sh’load of oil, instead.

A shipment of oil headed Thursday to North Korea in exchange for the expected shutdown soon of the communist nation’s only working nuclear reactor, which would be the first step by Pyongyang to stop making atomic bombs in nearly five years.

In Coase’s The Problem of Social Cost, the problem was cattle-ranching or bee-keeping or some other mundane thing of little interest to most people. The caveat to his theorem, however, is the absence of transaction costs – which unfortunately exist in the real world. Sometimes, they’re ginormous. Now, I don’t trust Pyongyang as far as I could throw him, and I imagine that the South Koreans don’t, either. But, it’s a start, and if you don’t want your neighbor using nuclear power, give him the next best alternative.

Eh, maybe this is a bad analogy, but Coase is the first thing I thought of when I saw the headline…

no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics