What about oil prices?
April 27, 2006
First, the Good News: The recently (by which I mean: occurring over the last 2 years) rising gas prices have yet to show any significant impact on the auto-industry.
“So far, the perceived gas price increases have not had any discernable impact on new-vehicle buying patterns, at least with regard to the size of the engine,” said Tom Libby, senior director of industry analysis at the division of Westlake Village, Calif.-based market researcher J.D. Power
And now for the Bad News: It’s about to set in.
“[T]here have been some reports that consumers are shifting away from SUVs and into smaller vehicles…That would be bad news for Detroit automakers, which make a lot of their money on big, powerful vehicles.According to a study released Wednesday, 62% of new-vehicle shoppers are at least strongly considering the purchase of a vehicle they normally would not have considered, and half of those, or 30%, say they already have changed their minds about what vehicle they are going to buy.”
And now for the politically-charged news, CNN reports:
WASHINGTON (CNN) — Every American taxpayer would get a $100 rebate check to offset the pain of higher pump prices for gasoline, under an amendment Senate Republicans hope to bring to a vote Thursday.
I’m just curious: Where is this money going to come from? For every person in the United States? Because, you know, that’s like 30 Billion dollars, or three times Exxon-Mobil’s Y2005 net profits. For every taxpayer, perhaps? I’m sure CNN is not intentionally misleading, and that the proposal will probably only affect “taxpayers,” but even this lends itself to problems, as Kip points out. He beat me to the punch by a couple of hours, so I’ll point you to his take on it, here.
Even though I’m fairly confident that the sum (whatever it may be) will not represent any diminution of government spending in other spheres, the money will probably just come off a Federal printing press somehwere, I suppose I’ll take mine and gladly spend it…
The bottom line: When politicians engage in “rent seeking,” it can really only be considered “vote buying.”
Comments
Leave a Comment
If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
Categories
- Agora!
- American Politics
- Anarchy!
- Blog Reactions
- Bureaucracy
- Conspiracy Theory
- Democracy is Great!
- Dog Blogging
- Drug War Rants
- Economic Fallacies
- Economics Lessons
- Election '08
- environmentalism
- Food & Drink
- Fun Stuff
- Gay Rights
- gnar
- gold bugging
- Government is Slavery
- Gun Control
- Health Care
- immigration
- junk science
- Left Libertarian
- Legalese
- Literature
- localized
- MA Carnival
- memes
- metablogging
- order from chaos
- personal finance
- Personal Life
- Police State
- ponderings
- Pop Culture
- Potpourri
- Property Rights
- quotes
- Rants
- Religion
- Rent Seeking
- Seen and Unseen
- shredding gnar
- Strikebusting
- Subsidize This!
- Taxation is Theft
- Uncategorized
- Warfare State
- Women's Studies 101
- World Politics
- world travel