Rackham Golf Course - Follow-up
December 22, 2006
A few months back I mentioned the sad situation surrounding the Rackham Golf Course, and I said I’d try to stay up-to-date on the matter. The course lies entirely within the city limits of Huntington Woods, but the fee simple owner of the acreage is the City of Detroit.
That said, the Course’s value in terms of cash-flow is only about $3 or $4M, much less* than Premium Golf, LLC’s generousoffer of $11.25M. What’s odd about this, is that I’m hoping for a court order to prevent the sale of this land, which, if conveyed by private parties, I would certainly side with the would-be sellers. If a private citizen, or a group of private citizens, or a corporation owned the 120-acre course, I would certainly understand the complaints of the Huntington Woods citizens, however I would take no particular interest in the case unless a court order prevented the sale. But, under these circumstances, there is just something unwholesome about Municipal ownership of property outside of the geographic limitations of its jurisdiction. There is something unwholesome about municipal ownership of property, in general, because of the conflicts inherent in any body politic.
I suppose when the battle comes down to two Munis, I’d prefer to see the preference given to the home jurisdiction. Governments don’t have property rights in any proper sense of the words. Governments don’t have any rights - all they have are powers. The citizens, though, have rights. I don’t believe that the HW citizens have a “right” to a golf-course view, nor do they have a “right” to the inflated property values resultant from their fortunate milieu. But they do certainly have the “right” to be free from any actions taken by the City of Detroit, that do not exist within the geographic limitations of the City of Detroit, just as they would have the “right” to be free from any action taken by the city of Mogadishu, Somalia, or by Newark, NJ. There are necessary limitations to the powers of any government, and I’d suggest for starters that those limits begin absolutely at whatever at the border of whatever land over which the government claims jurisdiction.
about $3M if you are satisfied with a 3% return.
Comments
Leave a Comment
If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
Categories
- Agora!
- American Politics
- Anarchy!
- Blog Reactions
- Bureaucracy
- Conspiracy Theory
- Democracy is Great!
- Dog Blogging
- Drug War Rants
- Economic Fallacies
- Economics Lessons
- Election ‘08
- environmentalism
- Food & Drink
- Fun Stuff
- Gay Rights
- gnar
- gold bugging
- Government is Slavery
- Gun Control
- Health Care
- immigration
- junk science
- Left Libertarian
- Legalese
- Literature
- localized
- MA Carnival
- memes
- metablogging
- order from chaos
- personal finance
- Personal Life
- Police State
- ponderings
- Pop Culture
- Potpourri
- Property Rights
- quotes
- Rants
- Religion
- Rent Seeking
- Seen and Unseen
- shredding gnar
- Strikebusting
- Subsidize This!
- Taxation is Theft
- Uncategorized
- Warfare State
- Women’s Studies 101
- World Politics
- world travel