Free Riders & Fuel Efficiency
March 20, 2007
That’s all well and good - except that a 50% improvement in fuel efficiency doesn’t cost “hundreds more” to build. It cost “thousands” more to build. And whenever there is a divergence between the highest bidder and the lowest seller, demand will go unsatisfied: No matter how many people are willing to pay $20,000 for a 40mph car, none will be built until someone thinks of a way to build them for less than that amount.
Everyone is willing to do “their part” to help the environment, as long as other people are willing to bear the true burden. People are always willing to force others to pay for things they desire for themselves.
Comments
1 Comment so far
Leave a Comment
If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.
Archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
Categories
- Agora!
- American Politics
- Anarchy!
- Blog Reactions
- Bureaucracy
- Conspiracy Theory
- Democracy is Great!
- Dog Blogging
- Drug War Rants
- Economic Fallacies
- Economics Lessons
- Election ‘08
- environmentalism
- Food & Drink
- Fun Stuff
- Gay Rights
- gnar
- gold bugging
- Government is Slavery
- Gun Control
- Health Care
- immigration
- junk science
- Legalese
- Literature
- localized
- MA Carnival
- memes
- metablogging
- order from chaos
- personal finance
- Personal Life
- Police State
- ponderings
- Pop Culture
- Potpourri
- Property Rights
- quotes
- Rants
- Religion
- Rent Seeking
- Seen and Unseen
- shredding gnar
- Strikebusting
- Subsidize This!
- Taxation is Theft
- Uncategorized
- Warfare State
- Women’s Studies 101
- World Politics
- world travel
Too true. Also, the furor to set efficiency standards seems to ignore the law of unintended consequences.
When the CAFE standards were set, it made the newer, more efficient cars more expensive. So people kept their older, inefficient cars longer - offsetting the standards. When people did buy the newer models, they drove them farther and more often because they got better mileage.
When you consider that the hybrid cars in the article may actually pollute more than conventional vehicles, the push for standards really seems silly and misinformed. My favorite line: When you pool together all the combined energy it takes to drive and build a Toyota Prius, the flagship car of energy fanatics, it takes almost 50 percent more energy than a Hummer - the Prius’s arch nemesis.