no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics

The Auto Bailout Will Not Be Repaid

December 14th, 2009

I predicted this almost a year ago to-date, noting that even if they “repay” their loans, those of us who really financed it won’t get our money back. Uncle Sam will, but we won’t see a penny of it; no dividend checks, no profit sharing, nothing.

Well, it’s official. According to the Detroit News, the Obama administration concedes that the auto bailout money will not be repaid. The silver lining, according to the White House, is that “the projected loss came down to $30 billion from $44 billion” an improvement attributed to better-than-forecast auto sales.

My take is that most of the “improvement” in auto sales for FY2009 were simply time shifted from 2010 or 2011 due to the cash for clunkers debacle, which means that it’s not a real improvement, and in years to come we’ll end up paying for these short-term gains.

Citibank $15bn Equity Offering Will Not “Repay” TARP Money

December 10th, 2009

Citibank is trying to gain regulatory permission for a $15B equity offering so that it can try to repay the TARP bailout money it received for its part in the largest swindle in history.

So they’re borrowing money to pay back more borrowed money. It would be funny (like stupid-funny), if it weren’t such a crime.

Citi borrowed money from the government who stole it from the people.  The American government stepped in and handed $20B to Citigroup despite overwhelmingly public opposition to corporate bailouts (depending on who you ask, this was either the result of collusion or blackmail).

Now, Citigroup would like to offer us — the public — the opportunity to buy equity shares. The proceeds of this sale will then be used not as productive capital, but to simply repay the Government for the “loan” they granted of our money and without our permissions.

Citi is trying to sell equity to the people in order to raise cash to repay their “loan” from the government. And if the people don’t buy up these shares, the FED will. Either most of us are totally f*cked.

The men and women who were robbed (the first round cost an average of about $5,000 per taxpayer) by Uncle Sam to finance Citi’s TARP life support are not going to be “repaid”, instead the money will just be Hoovered up by the Government. The Government has no intentions of giving it back to us.

It’s a shell game. And we’re the marks.

Bankers Cry Over ‘Restricted’ Bonuses

December 2nd, 2009

Big Bank brings nation’s economy to the breaking point. Big Bank begs, pleads, or threatens the government in to giving it a massive bailout, (of which the citizenry disapproves nearly unanimously). Big Bank proceeds to offer extravagant bonus packages to its employees, which largesse is financed 100% by the taxpayers.

It should come as no surprise that the general public, aghast at being bled dry in order to provide for some C-Suite bankers’ Bentley or Rolls or vacation home on the Riviera, cries “Foul!”

The most appalling thing about the whole situation is the banks’ responses: generally they argue that “If we don’t give huge bonuses, we’ll lose our employees!”

Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, recipient of the world’s biggest taxpayer bailout, said the British government’s “very restrictive” control over 2009 bonuses risks driving employees away.

—RBS Says ‘Restrictive’ Bonuses May Prompt Staff Exits

Cry me a river, will you? Your organization performed so poorly that it “needed” emergency life support from the nation’s taxpayers, which it took against their wishes and better judgment. This does not, under any circumstance merit “bonuses”. (In fact, in light of recent performance, I’m not so sure these are the sort of employees you should want to retain in the first place!) Not for anyone. Ever.

But in case you haven’t been paying attention, unemployment is staggering. All industries and sectors of the economy are hurting. The Banks could find a dozen qualified, competent applicants to fill any one of these positions at a fraction of the price of a single $500,000 bonus.

The Banks are worried about attrition? Defection? ROFLCOPTER.

Where are they going to go? Defection means they have options. They don’t.

If the employees threaten to quit, call their bluffs (that’s what it is, after all). I’d tell them, “Get f*cking lost. Don’t let the door hit you in the arse on the way out.”

no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics