no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics

Climate Scandal: Story of the Century, Ignored by Mainstream News

November 30th, 2009

Today these are all front page news stories: Tiger Woods crashed his car, rumored to be be cheating on his wife. The daughter of a former president is engaged to be married. Black people are disproportionately impacted by the current economic depression. Dubai World is bankrupt. Obama vows to continue war in Afghanistan. Some guy shot and killed a few cops near Seattle.

news front page stories, November 30, 2009

But all of the news outlets are ignoring* the story of the century.

Scientists at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

Which is enough, in itself, to cast doubt on every single conclusion drawn from these data. It means there is no way to test them. No way to validate or invalidate them. It doesn’t mean that the conclusions are wrong, it means that we have no evidence to suggest that the conclusions are right. Coupled with the thousands of leaked e-mail correspondences released last week, I think there’s a good case to be made that the researchers were involved in deliberate misrepresentation of their findings.

“Climategate” (did I mention I hate the use of ‘-gate’ as a suffix?) should be the story of the century. One comment at the Times explains:

this global warming email disclosure, and now the incredible loss of raw data relating to science about the alleged destruction of the earth…. should be one of the biggest stories of the last 100 years, bigger than the Pentagon Papers or Watergate or any other…because the entire world was being manipulated into action based on the premise that the world might come to an end on science that was supposed to be unimpeachable

For twenty years or more, the entire world has been duped into action based on faulty, flawed, incomplete, exaggerated or untestable “science”. Governments have enacted policies to combat the “effects” of a phenomena the existence of which has never been proven, and the validity of which has just been destroyed.

But nobody’s talking about it.  They don’t need censorship, just misdirection, distractions.

*In fairness, this story was mentioned on the Fox News homepage. But it was buried, as they say in the print industryy, well “below the fold”.

Raised-Bed Gardening: Do It Yourself

May 30th, 2009

This spring, prompted in part by a desire to waste less of my productivity, and in part by the novelty of the idea, and in part by the cred I stand to gain among greenies, I decided I wanted to start my own vegetable garden.  However, my backyard is on the North half of the property, so the shadows cast by the house and the garage, combined with those case by three large, 50+ year old trees (I think Maples) growing one on each lot line, and one big old White Burch growing in the South-Central region,keep my yard in near constant shade.

This is very nice for hanging out and barbecuing, but effectively useless for growing a vegetables garden, although I do have a patch of chives, and some basil, and oregano growing back there.  It seemed all hope was lost — until I beheld the awesome power of the internets, and found myself learning about square foot gardening and other raised-bed, intensive techniques.

So I built a box about 5 feet long and 20 inches wide out of some salvage 2 x 10 that I found in the garage rafters, fastened the sides together with drywall screws, and covered the bottom with the remainder of the 2 x 10s, leaving about 1/4 inch between each board for drainage.  I also drilled some 3/4 inch holes at interval across the bottom.  The box rests on 2 x 4 legs.

square foot garden

Now, the “square foot” approach seems like more effort than I’m prepared to undertake, at least this year. Instead, I just threw a bunch of soil, some peat moss that some friends left behind when they moved, some good mulch, and mixed it up.  Then I proceeded to just cram it full of naturey-goodness, paying no particular attention to spacing or whatever.  I’m sure I could get a better yield if I tried harder, but like I said, this first time is more of a lark than anything.  Next year I plan to take it a bit more seriously.

In the top left, hidden behind the bell peppers in the bottom left, are two cucumber plants already sprouting whatever it is that yields num num later in the year.  The bell peppers have begun to flower nicely, and the hot peppers planted adjacent are also doing nicely.  Above the hot peppers is a cherry tomato plant on which I noticed the first flowers earlier this week.  I threw some onions in the mix, too.

The second bin contains spinach.  From the little that I read, spinach sucks all nutrients out of the soil so it is best to keep separate from most other vegetables.  So I did that.

The third bin (which may be subdivided later) has not been planted yet, but I’ve got a large tomato plant with flowers, and I’m looking to pick up another one at the market tomorrow perhaps.  I have about 40 more onions that need planting soon, and I’m also considering carrots or potatoes or some other root vegetable.  There is also a peat-pot with Mint growing, which might be transplanted to clay and left to grow inside the kitchen window, in order to satisfy my summer love for Mojitos.

My recipe calls for raw sugar instead of the white powdered sugar or white crystal sugar, the juice of one lime (give or take) and I use a generous amount of mint leaves, maybe 5 or 6.  Muddle the sugar, lime juice, and mint leaves first, then add ice, then rum, then soda, then stir.

I’m looking forward to learning something from this, and also hoping to get some good eats, too.

Why Do Greenies Hate Freedom and Support Fascism?

December 16th, 2008

Hubris.

“If only the right people were in charge, implementing the right policies…”

I see a lot of enviro-blogs while browsing around the internet, which seems to have been (sometime in the last two years) painted green. In addition to the Castor and Pollux of environmentalism (Ethanol subsidies and energy independence) many environmentalists also have a solar fetish.

One common theme is that government is the solution to their pet problems. They’re wrong, of course. For example, environmentalists should hate ethanol primarily because it is destroying the environment.

Recently, I came across an article called Farming the Sun at Treehugger.com, the author is optimistic about “sun farms” and writes favorably about a particularly large one in Germany, overseen by Heiner Gärtner, who converted his family’s pig-farm to a solar-powered eyesore several years ago.

…As he sees it, his farm is merely adapting to an economic cycle that happens to favor a different sort of energy.

No, Gärtner is not adapting to an economic cycle that “favors a different sort of energy,” he’s suckling at the teat of government, adapting to a political cycle that subsidizes certain endeavors. This is more appropriately described as “rent-seeking,” the process whereby an individual games the government system to extract profits in excess of those which he would otherwise earn in a free and competitive marketplace.

In 2004, Germany passed a new law that guaranteed people who built solar parks a minimum price for each kilowatt of electricity that was two to three times the market price.

Mr. Gärtner makes more than $600,000 a year from the sale of this electricity, which will allow him to pay off his loans in 15 to 16 years. That is good for him, because the government is phasing out the preferential prices over the next decade. The Mercedes parked in his farmyard attests to his success.

No. Mr. Gärtner essentially steals $600,000 a year from his neighbors. He does this by selling electricity to the German government, which they turn around and sell at a staggering loss to the same taxpayers who had no choice but to finance Heiner’s Mercedes.

This is not a success story for environmentalism, and it should not be championed by those who allege to love the environment. It is legalized plunder, and should be described as nothing short thereof. Every German taxpayer is a victim of the scheisters who seek rents at the State’s enviro-trough.

There’s nothing per se wrong with encouraging more “environmentally friendly” or neutral sources of energy. I’m all for technological advances. But as long as a farmer is guaranteed a certain rate of profit, through a politically controlled infinite arbitrage opportunity financed by taxes, there is no real incentive to get better, there is no incentive to develop a real, profitable energy alternative.

Government is the single greatest threat to the environment, and as I’ve said before in response to environmental questions found elsewhere on the interwebs:

The solution to whatever ails the planet will certainly not come from the fucking cancer that’s strangling it. —Environmental Questions, 9.15.08

no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics