no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics

On Population Growth

May 31st, 2007

In response to a comment yesterday evening warning against anything even approaching an open-borders policy, I’m putting together a response. Commenter “razorgator” suggested that I watch this video on google. I hate watching videos, for the record – and this goes to everyone: don’t send them to me, give me text. I can read much faster than I can watch, and text is also much easier to cite in response.

There are serious ethical and logical problems with isolationist policies, to which the historical record is a mighty fine testament. These problems are compounded by co-opting definitions and piss-poor methodology.

More on all of this tonight. I hope you like spreadsheets.

Pessimistic Predictions on the Fate of the E.U.

May 1st, 2007

The increasingly pessimistic – dare I say apocalyptic – Brussels Journal, (which frequently panders to European right-wing hyper-nationalism by exaggerating the Islamic threat, social identity, and other “end-is-nigh” hyperbole) still carries the occasional article worth reading. Today I came across a column written by a Briton who goes by “Archonix,” who is clearly unhappy with the European Union – a multi-national government that is essentially accountable to nobody:

…I never voted for the creation of a supranational, unaccountable government that does not submit to the will of the people via an election. In fact, I did not vote at all. I have never had a say on whether I want my country — which no longer exists — to be a part of this. The EU has no mandate and never has.

Archonix draws comparisons to the (American) revolutionary declaration of independence, and also to Germany under Otto von Bismarck in support of his argument, that the natural end of a super-state like the EU is total warfare, if even on some distant horizon. Now, even though the EU is comprised of States which haven’t won a war in a hundred years or more (I’m pointing fingers at France in particular, but Germany is on the list, too) I’m not so quick to dismiss the idea because I understand that the health of States is war. It follows from their very nature, that they can only ever acquire anything through violence; whether it is a war for resources, territory, or dominion, or the various and inescapable threats looming constant over the heads of its own constituency, the health of the state is violence.

Every day I break about 30 laws whilst engaged in what were previously lawful activities. Most of these laws are EU-inspired regulations prescribing the details of how activities are to be carried out. My computer does not comply with regulations on lead content, electrical output or anything else, despite being perfectly safe. The lights in my house will soon be made illegal.

I read somewhere, recently, that British agents would soon be in charge of descending upon citizens’ homes to determine whether said citizens had a television, in which case they would be liable for a telly-tax or some nonsense. And the Dutch – I think it was the Dutch, but maybe the Belgians, would be using infra-red camera-equipped helicopters, performing aerial surveillance to find which citizens were dodging the new tax on barbecue emissions. Archonix concludes by asking rhetorically, “What price the ability to spend the same coin in 20 countries?”

It looks like you’re in for a pretty rough ride across the pond.

Afghanistan & Prohibition

September 20th, 2006

Despite the “several hundreds of millions of dollars” that the Bush administration has poured into Afghanistan, in an effort to curb the production of poppy, cultivation has increased. A State Department official denies Afghani sovereignty even on the most basic of humanitarian grounds; denying that “excuses” like abject poverty are not enough to justify the production of opium. By all accounts, opium production in Afghanistan has increased significantly in the last few years.

“[Opium has] become an industrial production,” said Doris Buddenberg, director of the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime here, noting that Afghanistan’s opium output this year was a staggering 6,700 tons. Rural poverty, dashed hopes for economic recovery, Taliban blandishments and anti-government sentiment “all added up to more families deciding to grow poppy,” she said.

Of course, hand-in-hand with prohibition, there is the widespread corruption, which is always, everywhere, encouraged and rewarded by the prohibitionist tactics which support an otherwise unjustifiable black-market price. People will continue to grow the poppy from which opium is made as long as there exist economic incentives to do so. As long as there exists the possibility for a marginally better existence, Afghani subsistence farmers will continue to cultivate poppies, and those poppies will continue to be used in the production of opium.

The laws of economics are not subject to popular vote. They cannot be overturned or repealed by intra-governmental pressure, legislation, fines or penalties. Prohibition’s history is a one of near total failure. There is little reason to believe that it will be any different in Afghanistan.

no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics