no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics

The Cost, Per Capita, of Occupying Iraq

January 6th, 2009

In Immigration: Open the Borders, I pointed to a Juris Naturalis post about immigration, in which the author was addressing “Christians amenable to liberty” on the benevolence of open immigration. This week, I found myself browsing another post at Juris Naturalis, this time, a very short but to-the-point anti-war plea.

We should’ve just moved all the Iraqis here, he says. A novel idea, indeed!

The author ntoes that the explicit, monetary cost of the invasion and occupation of Iraq has to-date is between $500 B and $900 B, although some estimates have suggested that it could be as high as $3 Trillion.

Playing with the $900 Billion figure, he concludes that this has cost something like $32,000 for each man, woman, and child in Iraq. If he had used the $3T figure, the cost per Iraqi would be about $100,000. And what, praytell, have any of them got to show for it?

And what, praytell, have any of them got to show for it?

Most of them still live in abject, third world poverty, suffer from rolling blackouts, lack of adequate medical care, and the occasional bombings, household raids, insurgent attacks, and all the other niceties that go along with a war in your backyard.

Sure, they no longer suffer under the sometimes brutal regime of Saddam Hussein, but in all fairness, the trade embargoes imposed by the West (among other policies) only exacerbated the domestic problem of a megalomaniacal dictator. It should’ve been possible to accomplish regime change for far less than $900 Billion. And if it wasn’t, it’s only because the government was doing it wrong.

Playing with the $900 Billion figure, I conclude that the war has cost something like $3,000 for each man, woman, and child in the U.S. Using the $3T figure, the cost per American soars to about $10,000.

And what, praytell, have any of us got to show for it?

Juris Naturalist rightly notes that we “ought not support wars, even for humanitarian purposes. Instead [people] ought to support open-immigration laws, and then volunteer to pay for refugee and oppressed peoples rescue efforts.”

Bravo! But you see, there’s no money in that. There’s no power in that, which is why government will always favor a policy of war, to any number of peaceful and voluntary alternatives.

To Avoid Global Recession…

November 16th, 2008

… All we need is the united volition of “world leaders.”

Right.

In a statement after the summit, Mr Bush said: “Whatever reforms are recommended, we need to be guided by this simple fact: that the best way to solve our problems and solve the people’s problems is for there to be economic growth. And the surest path to that growth is free market capitalism.”

The premise is correct: a free market is probably the best way to achieve economic growth. This is the sort of doublespeak that destroys language, destroys communication. Using this statement as a foundation for even more anti-market regulation, is a 100% non sequitir. To the extent that anyone still believes in free markets, each lazy, misguided, or downright malicious equivocation like this erodes that belief further, yet.

You can’t play market.

A dozen, a hundred, a thousand Ph.D. Economists, policy wonks, Statesmen, Presidents or Dictators can’t just use their notions of what a free market might do, as a roadmap for actually achieving that sort of equality and progress. They can’t decide to simply imagine a free market, and use that daydream as a guide to installing ham-fisted, top-down, coercive legislation and regulations, in order to achieve that vision of a “free” market.

A free market abhors these things.

Prohibition is the Problem

November 7th, 2008

While many businesses are suffering, the illegal drug trade remains robust.

[In Holland] the illegal cannabis trade reached an estimated $3 billion with most demand coming from Great Britain, France, Belgium and Germany but also from Scandinavian countries, where demand is on the rise

“We still have the image of people growing a few cannabis plants in the attic but what we’re really seeing is that organized criminals have long since taken over and they have turned this into big business…”

Three billion dollars of black market economy? This is just one controlled substance, and a relatively inexpensive one, at that. Yet, the last time I was in the ‘Dam (2003) the coffee shops in Amsterdam weren’t overrun by Uzi-wielding mafioso, or dreadlocked caricatures of Rastafied gangsters.

There is a reason why organized crime doesn’t traffic in cola, blue jeans, pumpkins, or christmas bulbs. Almost anybody can make and sell these things, almost anywhere in the world. Organized criminals can’t compete with legitimate businesses. Good trumps evil when people are free.

The war on drugs enables terrorism, domestically and abroad. Drugs are not the problem. Prohibition is the problem.

no third solution

Blogging about liberty, anarchy, economics and politics